THE NOW YORK JURY MAKES IT THIER LIFE'S WORK TO FRUSTRATE DONALD TRUMP.-Trump Arrives for Criminal Trial and LOSES BIG Right Away

The criminal trial against donald trump for his falsification of business records to interfere with the 2016 election is now officially underway. Donald trump arrived at court earlier this morning, as donald trump arrived in the manhattan courtroom in a case being prosecuted by the manhattan district attorney donald trump's new company trump media's stock was absolutely tanking. It was down 15% as donald trump arrived in the uh manhattan courtroom. Donald trump arrived looking very unwell, looking panicked, he did his usual routine where he talked about how he's being persecuted and how it's unfair and how upset he is, but that he's happy to be there kind of the usual stick that he does um. Let me just share with you a brief portion of donald trump arriving I'm not going to show too much of it, because I have no interest in kind of furthering his lies and disinformation, but but then, after showing you, this I want to talk about the motions that were heard, donald trump lost some big motions.

This morning he lost the motion to recuse justice bashan. He lost a motion to try to prevent information about his catch and kill deal with the national inquirer from coming in, and we also learned that donald trump's uh subpoena to the department of justice that trump was trying to use to delay the trial and to kind of create a way to blow up. The the trial has actually backfired big time on donald trump, since, rather than getting exculpatory information that would help donald trump and actually turned up information that is very harmful to donald trump, including emails from kellyan, conway hope, picks, steve, bannon and others uh trying to deal with the access hollywood tapes coming out in 2016, where trump bragged about sexually assaulting women- and they were talking in these text- messages about ways to try to you- know, stop more bad news from coming out. Ultimately, that's one of the things that led to the catch and kill scheme that donald trump had with the national inquirer, whereby they would try to purchase stories from individuals who donald trump had sex with or who donald trump wronged or people who are thinking about going public with stories about

donald trump they'd pay for those stories, then they would kill the stories by not publishing the stories but owning the rights to the stories and then threatening to sue the people if they came out publicly with the stories as part of a deal with donald, trump and so more details about that deal were actually turned over to the uh manhattan district attorney's office that they didn't have before, based on donald trump's attempt at trying to delay the case by doing a an 11th hour subpoena to the department of justice go figure. Let me just show you donald trump arriving right now and then, let's talk a little bit more here, let's play this clip are lose voters if there conviction this is an assault on america.

Nothing like this has ever happened before there never been anything like it. Every legal scholar said this case is nonsense. It should never have been brought. It doesn't deserve anything like this. There is no case and they've said it. People that don't necessarily follow or like donald trump said. This is an outrage that this case was brought. This is political persecution. This is a persecution like never before nobody's ever seen. Anything like it and again it's a case that should have never been brought, you know so so the usual routine of donald trump I'm, proud to be here. This is a p. This is a persecution against the united states of america. No, it is the fact that you paid off an adult film actress, while your wife melani was pregnant um. In order to avoid that story going public, and then you made fraudulent business record entries to cover up what you did that's what this is about. This is all of your own making. This is a crime. You've been charged with 34 separate felony counts for the crimes you can serve multiple years in prison for these crimes and you're, just not above the law. That's what this is is about ever tried to break a bad habit and felt like you're, climbing everest in flipflops.

Yeah we've been there too, but here's a breath of fresh air fume. It's not about giving up. It's about. Switching up fume takes your habit and simply makes it better, healthier and a whole lot more. Enjoyable. Fume is an innovative award-winning flavored air device. That does just that instead of vapor fume uses, flavored air instead of electronics, fume is completely natural and instead of harmful chemicals, fume uses delicious flavors. You get it instead of bad fume is good. It's a habit, you're free to enjoy and makes replacing your bad habit easy. Your fume comes with an adjustable airflow dial and is designed with movable parts and magnets for fidgeting, giving your fingers a lot to do, which is helpful for de-stressing and anxiety. While breaking your habit. The first time I tried fume. It was way more flavorful than I thought and it feels very fresh. The look and feel of fume is very sleek. It's well weighted perfectly balanced and extremely fun to fidget, with plus fumes just released a magnetic stand for your fume, so there's no more losing it around the house. It's built with fidgeting in mind. You can spin your fume around and around and around it start the year off right with the good habit by going to tume.

s, tr r, yfu, m.com midas and getting the journey packed today. Fume is giving listeners of the show 10% off when you use our code. Midas to help make starting the good habit that much easier go to trif nume.com, sl midas and use our code midas all right. Let's go to the motions that were heard. The first motion that was heard early on was donald trump's attempt to try to recuse justice maran again arguing that justice maran's daughter, uh doesn't like him and saying that it's unfair that justice maran has a daughter who was involved in politics and that somehow that makes justice maran uh that justice maron can't be fair and can't be uh, impartial folks, almost a year ago, at this point, donald trump tried to recuse justice maran on the same grounds. In fact, just as maran got an ethics opinion from uh the new york state bar from the judicial councel about the issue just because, while he didn't see that there was a conflict at all here, um, he wanted to make sure that everything was transparent and done. The right way, there's no conflict here. It was rejected over a year ago. Trump's brought that again remember.

He brought that last week before the appellate division and they rejected it. Well that was heard again before justice maran, who said that you know this is frivolous. The accusations here are attenuated and then very swift denied donald trump's attempt at recusing him and justice maran said. Look it's every bit as much a responsibility of a judge to deny recusal as it is to accept a recusal when a recusal is merited otherwise. Criminal defendants would try to game the system and try to always be recusing judges that they don't like. So that was rejected right away. The next issue that was addressed this morning was whether or not the prosecution and to what extent the prosecution can talk about the deal between the company ami, which was the parent company for the national inquirer um. That was led by an individual by the name of david pecker, the extent to which the prosecution could talk about the deal between ami national, inquirer and david pecker and donald trump. To engage in this catch and kill scheme whereby, as I said earlier in the video, they would go and find bad stories about donald trump people who wanted to go public under the pretext of being.

Oh we're, journalists we're going to write about that, but we want to buy your story, so they'd buy the bad stories. They'd kill the bad stories by not publishing the stories and then they wouldn't get out in the 2016 election and that formed the kind of you know background. Ultimately, when the catch and kill scheme, the for tax reasons, ami felt that they couldn't do the stormy daniels payoff. So ultimately, donald trump had to make a falsified business record and act like a payment was being made to michael cohen for legal fees. But in fact, what the money was going for was a payment uh to stormmy daniels to catch and kill her story right before the 2016 uh election was to take place so that uh, that story would not get out. That's ultimately, why you may be saying: well, you know, explain the deal in ami and why that's relevant when ami wasn't able to catch and kill for stormmy daniels and do the thing where they bite out, because in many ways that could be viewed as imputed income to donald trump and they felt uncomfortable committing tax fraud.

Then donald trump had to come up with another way around it and the way he came up with was this payoff to michael cohen his legal bills, which he would then pay stormmy daniels and that's how he would try to it. Basically and that's a felony in new york, you can't make fraudulent business records and entries the one thing that justice maran did say, though, is that he's not going to allow um for the access hollywood tape itself to be played? You can talk about the access hollywood tape, but the playing of the tape justice maran found the prejudicial aspect of it would outweigh its probative value here, since this is not a case about sexual assault or or abuse that it's such an inflammatory tape that playing the actual audio could confuse the jury about the issues that this cases about fraudulent business records, but the prosecution can still talk about it. The other thing that justice maran was kind of wary of uh, allowing at this stage, although he may reconsider later, was the prosecution talking about melania being pregnant when the hush money payment was made um because again, the prejudicial value justice maran found could potentially outweigh um its probative value, its utility in a case involving fraudulent business records, whether or not melania was pregnant or not. Um is not necessarily central to the issue of was that business record fraudulent, which is why this case is a very document driven case to begin with, and why the prosecution just needs to really go through. Was this a check? Was it sent at this date? Did you classify this as legal fees? You know it's. It's a fair, narrowly confined case to um to those you know to those issues right there and then.

Finally, as I mentioned earlier in the video one of the things that we learned as well is that far from getting information and evidence that would be helpful to donald trump trump's attempt at you know trying to get the department of justice to turn over things that the department of justice would not have otherwise turned over at the 11th. Hour actually turns out it's very bad for donald trump. It seems to be documents, emails text, messages from kellyan, conway, hopic, steve ban and donald trump's inner circle about covering up things like the access, hollywood tape and um, covering up for donald, trump's uh misconduct and that then forming the basis for the hush money payments to stormmy daniels. So you know it really backfired for donald trump that he tried to create this kind of controversy. From the department of justice at the 11th hour, so that's where we stand right now with the jury coming in.

They also talked about jury instructions and um. This discussion about a hybrid approach to uh the jury, instructions and this this hybrid approach, first before getting into whether the jurors could be fair or impartial. First, seeing if the jurors are available for the trial, um and understanding their personal circumstances um and then, if they are available, then moving to whether they're, fair and impartial, then there is that um questionnaire that the jurors will get with 40, very 40, plus very specific questions then they'll analyze that and then, if jurors say that they can't be fair and impartial they'll get removed. The remaining jurors will stay in the room and then they'll be questioned about whether they could be fair or impartial and then each side can still, even if a juror claims they could be fair and impartial. Each side still has the ability to exercise a certain amount of challenges to remove jurors, who they think who the prosecution or that the defense thinks still wouldn't be good. Jurors, on the case, as long as the reasons are non-discriminatory in nature, that's where we stand, keep you posted every step of the way. Don't you worry, um we'll have updates throughout the day I'm ben myellis. This is the mest touch network at subscrib.

Let's get to 3 million together, follow our coverage here for continuing updates of the trial enough, send him to the big house, not the white. House get the new exclusive, te's mugs and stickers. Right now at store., mightest touch.

om, that's store., mightest touch.com

Home

Privacy Policy

Disclaimers

Contact Us

© 2020 Videoticle, made in OKC.